My Photo

Disclaimer

Subscribe to receive free e-mail updates

Faltering economy = More need to mediate

An interesting  article in today's FT highlights the impact of a faltering economy on the litigation process.

"The number of civil law cases jumped by a quarter last year, the first increase since Lord Woolf’s civil justice system reforms in 1999, according to Judicial Statistics.

The number of High Court commercial law cases, which rose from 49,442 in 2005 to 61,691 last year, is now at its highest level for six years.

The sharp increase has been blamed on challenging economic situations. This is likely to worsen as the credit squeeze increases the likelihood of commercial disputes.

The biggest increase came from the number of Companies Court proceedings initiated by the Chancery Division, which rose 54 per cent in 2006 to 23,125 cases.

The Companies Court deals primarily with company liquidations, including winding-up petitions and claims to prevent individuals from becoming, or continuing as, a company director."

I anticipate this growth in civil claims will be mirrored in the Employment Tribunals.

This strong litigation background will provide more incentive for all parties to mediate. With its high success rate and potential to cut out costs, lawyers will have good reason to consider more mediation as a way to settle cases early.

Lawyers can also consider the benefits of effective preparation when they represent their clients which is a theme explored in the mediation training we provide at the "Making Mediation Work" course.

Less fighting talk

This is an article below in the November edition of Director Magazine which deals with mediation in the workplace.

Director reaches individual company directors across a range of industries and company sizes. All readers are board level, with 42 per cent CEO/MD or chairperson level and 51 per cent other directors. They are entrepreneurial, influential and dynamic. Over 60 per cent of IoD members have under 200 employees within their company. There are also IoD members on 92 per cent of the boards listed in the FTSE 100. This means Director's strength lies in targeting SMEs but cannot be ignored if you want to influence board level decisions within UK blue chip companies.

Alison Coleman of Director writes:

"Conflict is part of British business life. It can stimulate innovation and healthy competition, but it can also destroy individuals and companies if it develops into open hostility.

But calling in the lawyers at the first sign of a problem is becoming a thing of the past, as directors, in growing numbers, embrace the concept of mediation.

The costs of litigation to business are huge, with lawyers' fees and court costs alone totalling around £33bn a year, not including the longer-term costs of bad feeling and lost goodwill that can be felt for years to come.

As an alternative method of dispute resolution, mediation has several advantages: it is cheaper, quicker and, in around 95 per cent of cases, it concludes with a satisfactory outcome for the parties involved.

Justin Patten, principal of Human Law Mediation, believes the idea is catching on in the UK, driven partly by a desire to avoid legal costs, but also by the courts themselves.

"The new rules introduced in April allow judges to issue court orders for litigants to consider mediation first," he explains. Patten argues that the benefits of mediation go far beyond nipping the threat of a lawsuit in the bud. When people have the chance to clear the air, they are often able to re-establish a productive working relationship.

"An employment dispute, for example, can be extremely damaging to a business, especially if it goes to a tribunal," he points out. "As a mediator, I have seen situations where the root cause of the problem has been something quite trivial that has been allowed to fester. Through mediation, it can be quickly and easily resolved, and everyone can move on."

But according to Frank Hanna, founder of The Mediation Agency, which operates out of offices on both sides of the Atlantic, not all directors have grasped the point. "You are entitled to bring legal representation," he says, "and unfortunately, a lot of organisations do, which, of course, incurs extra costs. The whole point of mediation is that you don't need to get lawyers involved."

The Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution, founded 18 years ago with the aim of cutting the costs of conflict, has seen the number of mediation cases rise. The centre's chief executive, Karl Mackie, says businesses are recognising how an independent facilitator can transform a legal problem into a commercial negotiation.

Although a new trend is emerging of anticipating conflict and learning to manage it, he feels executives still have a long way to go. "Better knowledge of how and when to act in conflict situations could keep  their businesses from derailing and keep profits on track," he says.
But Mackie is encouraged by the fact that more managers are recognising and understanding the "iceberg effect": that the built-up conflict hidden beneath the surface causes more damage than the open dispute
."

IP ADR blog is born

VictoriaCongratulations to US attorney & mediator, Victoria Pynchon who has teamed up with Les Weinstein to form IP ADR Blog.

In effect, together they have  launched an intellectual property ADR practice and blog. The temporary blog site is http://www.ipadrservices.blogspot.com. Kevin O'Keefe at LexBlog is going to set up the permanent blog for us.

The IP practice allows Victoria to do what she loves the most, which is to drive a business deal, maximizing commercial strategies and synergies, as well as long-term business planning.

Victoria who is the author of the respected Settle It Now negotiation blog has been very helpful to me professionally so I am delighted to support this project ....Also the IP Kat has come up with a humourous post as well on the launch.   

In-house lawyers turn to early dispute resolution

My friend Diane Levin and author of the excellent blog, Online Guide To Mediation has a great post highlighting the trend for in-house lawyers to use ADR including, mediation. As she writes:

" Mark LeHocky, general counsel at Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, advocates the use of early dispute resolution to keep costs down and prevent disputes from, in his words, "metastasizing". As LeHocky explains,

...Litigation costs typically account for the biggest portion of expenditures that companies spend on outside counsel. And the proper management of disputes is in turn the biggest cost control opportunity most companies have before them...

... I actively pursue a package of early dispute resolution tools -- starting with a disciplined internal review process and the use of mediation and other ADR devices regardless of the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the positions of each dispute matter. I have served as a mediator for the federal courts for 10 years -- one of my few pro bono activities now that my kids are grown up enough that I can stop coaching soccer teams. That experience, together with my background in private practice, has transformed my thinking about how disputes arise and, more importantly, how they grow and metastasize unnecessarily.

More often than not, disputes go on longer than they should and become bigger than they need to be due to misunderstandings as to facts as much as legal issues. Sorting those items out as soon as possible is the best for everyone concerned and helps to avoid the unnecessary buildup of litigation fees and other costs. That doesn't mean we don't litigate. We do so when the situation warrants and we use the best and the brightest lawyers. But that happens only after we have pursued the early dispute resolution path in rigorous fashion."

Don't mediate too soon

As a firm believer in mediation, you may think I would believe that you should mediate early in a case every time.

Well think again.

Consider Geoff Sharp's post here. As he writes "Most clauses, and there are hundreds of versions, are drafted on the premise that the dispute should get to mediation sooner rather than later. Definitely before any arbitration/court proceedings are started.

Some are multi layered; 1) first negotiate, 2) move on to mediate, 3) then arbitrate or litigate as a last resort.

Many have strict time frames, often measured in days, so one side can force the selection of a mediator and convene the mediation within a nano second of the dispute occurring.

But, these clauses are pushing people through the doors of the mediation room too soon... before the dispute is mature, before the raw edges have been knocked off.

They come to the table without adequately defining to themselves, and each other, what the dispute is all about - upon what it is they agree and disagree, without adequate document exchange and to be honest without adequately spending time wallowing in the conflict and all that it brings with it."

Memo to clients - What are the iceberg costs of litigation?

192020iceberg202_2As a lawyer when you are advising a client on litigation, you should advise the client of the possible level of legal costs in taking the matter to the conclusion.

However a corporate client will have several other costs to factor which I describe as "iceberg costs."

Typically these impact on management time with CEDR estimating in 2006 that cost of conflict to UK business to be exceeding £30 bn a year.

These include:

  • Damage to company reputation of litigation
  • Loss of customers
  • Damage to Company morale
  • Missed opportunities and diversion of management time   

In my view it is these costs rather than the pure legal costs which give incentive to mediate and give the case to think about mediation. 

Law Com

  • An Affiliate of the Law.com Network
    From the Law.com Newswire

    Sign up to receive Legal Blog Watch by email
    View a Sample